Customize your website

Council pushes ahead Kettle Island, reconsiders Lower Duck

Laura Cummings
Published on January 14th, 2009
Published on Febuary 7th, 2010
Laura Cummings

Yes to Kettle, maybe to Lower Duck – city council has endorsed the NCC-led interprovincial crossing study moving forward to its second phase with the proposed Kettle Island bridge remaining its technically-preferred corridor, while voting to reconsider further examination of Lower Duck Island sites by a slim margin.

Topics :
NCC , Kettle Island , National Capital Region , Gatineau

A hotly-debated motion carried at council this morning – narrowly approved by one vote at 12-11 – confirmed that study operators NCE-Roche proceed to the project's next step. A vote to reconsider two locations at Lower Duck Island being included in the study's second phase, however, was passed 11-12 – with three more affirmative votes than required – leaving that decision pending. Barrhaven Coun. Jan Harder, who was under observation at hospital following a car accident, missed both votes. "We made a decision, we should stick to it," said Cumberland Coun. Rob Jellett during the proceedings, making reference to a council vote last summer that saw councillors support the Kettle Island corridor 17-4. "It's the right decision now. Too often on this council when we hear information we don't like, we turn around and start to criticize the people who provided the information. Too often on this council we pretend to be experts."

The 10 corridors initially part of the environmental assessment were all carefully considered along with "extensive" public consultation and examination, he continued, adding that previous interprovincial crossing studies have almost all mirrored the same conclusion. "The NCC approach is wrong in our city," countered Beacon Hill-Cyrville Coun. Michel Bellemare. "The problem is the NCC has come out with a recommendation for only one bridge. The trap we're falling into is that one bridge is going to solve all our problems."

Suggesting the NCC "has not been comprehensive enough in this exercise," Bellemare called the proposed bridge "the wrong approach," and one that will not solve the downtown truck traffic issue. "We will have as many trucks traveling through the downtown in the years to come as there are today," he added, pointing to a ring road around the National Capital Region as a better solution. "It doesn't make sense to transfer the problems … to our suburban corridors."

The continued bridge debate began earlier this week, at a special meeting of the transportation committee on Monday, Jan. 12 where study operators tabled their first-phase findings and recommendations, hoping to gain a city endorsement before moving ahead with the environmental assessment’s next step. Councillors also listened to residents give their take on the proposed structure, with approximately 50 delegations giving five-minute presentations.

With the Lower Duck question still to be decided, however, the NCC will also seek endorsements from the City of Gatineau, as well as both provincial governments prior to moving ahead with the study’s second phase.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Email to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

Orléans Star is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Enter the following code

Please copy the text above in this box.

Advertising

Advertising